Electro-Muscular Disruption (EMD) Technology
Versus Taser guns with rubber bullets: Most people use the term "Taser" and "Stun Gun" interchangeably. The difference between the two is more that one (Taser) shoots electrical probes, and the other (Stun Gun) are working on contact. The technology used by them are different, and not just a Taser stun gun on a string, as is sometimes described. Let me first briefly rehash the physical differences. A Stun Gun iscontact between the arms of electrical probes must be physically touching the body of your attacker. Working on a relatively simple principle that in no way be used to take a low voltage input (such as a simple 9 volt battery), and dramatically increased by one large (while the power well below lethal levels). You can read the different ways to do this on my website (http://www.snjselfdefense.com/stunmaster.htm)From Wikipedia, or some other self-defense sites on the Internet. The Taser on the other hand, is a stand-off weapon that shoots electrical probes, attached to clothing or skin needs aggressors'. Taser on duty, known as Electro-Muscular Disruption Technology (EMDT) in addition to a step voltage-up method. This is EMDT giving a Taser this incredible takedown power only with a (relatively) low output voltage. Put simply, one fires a Taser Stun Gun not, Even though almost all have a contact taser stun gun building in the event of a failure, refusal, or the attacker is already too close to the fire stand-off.
Stun guns themselves are incredibly effective both as a deterrent and of practical application. And 'my experience that ordinary people are so afraid of the 80,000 completed Talon Mini, which is the 975, 000 volt lithium Hot Shot. Simply turn the gun electric one, 1 second demonstration scare the pants off moreany. The problem is that the "common people" is not what is outside of rape, assault, and purse handles, because the extreme stresses the need to ensure that some monstrous, muscle bound nut stop jacked about Crystal Meth and PCP. Tony Montana absorbs waves of small-arms fire, while "running his little friend" is a bit 'of a stretch, but not much of a cocaine saturated insane. Increasing efficiency stun gun with the amount of time that remains in contactwith the aggressor. Lots of power deposited in a fit body as neuromuscular connections are overwhelmed. It causes the muscles to make a huge amount of work that almost immediately, leading to a rapid accumulation of lactic acid yield of the attacker can control voluntary muscle movement. The best analogy I can think of (who are aware) is the way we used to jam and confuse enemy radar and communications in air combat humiliated.
Communications Jamming: The goal of both types of non-lethal weapons with rubber bullets is to "jam" the electrical communication between the brain and muscles. If we look at it in terms of military interference of communication, the analogy fits quite well. Interference from noise or disturbance area decreased when not trying to deny the full spectrum VHF frequencies as saying. A powerful signal is transmitted across the spectrum of indecipherable noise. It isreasonably effective and everything heard on the radio is annoying static. The way to overcome the disturbance of noise is the "power" is in practice: a powerful, highly concentrated single frequency signal can penetrate the noise. A Stun Gun operates on a similar principle. An enormous amount of energy (voltage) range 14-17 watts, blockades, and confuses the electrical signals from the brain to the muscles of the body and overwhelms them. Various factors such as tolerance to pain, mental concentration,salt body and muscularity and others, determine the amount of force necessary to completely submerge the neuromuscular system. That's why it feels "strange but true" stories about getting kicked out, drug crazy, maniacally focused people to combat the effects of the stun gun on more than seems humanly possible. No one can fight a long time, but it is difficult to maintain constant contact with probe a savage attack by shaking.
Jamming Location: One way to dramaticallyincrease jamming effectiveness is to determine if a specific frequency, very narrow band of frequencies. Less force is required, and a couple of very interesting things can be replicated, such as changing a specific frequency for their use can be made. This is the desired end result of Electro-Muscular Disruption Technology, and why a Taser as effectively with an output voltage of only 50,000 volts. There are several methods for manipulating and refining targeted neuromuscularfrequency bands for communication. In general, varying the voltage waveform of energy production Joule most common. As far as I can tell you, Taser International and Stinger are at the forefront of new developments. There is a great video comparison of evidence that can be found on the Internet for sale for "Stinger Versus Taser Video" on a major search engine. The test was a complete independent call CRT decreased, and (only for full disclosure) funded byTaser International. Results may judge themselves (I am skeptical about everything, of course), but the only thing that is unmistakable, the immediate effect of the Taser. Electrical "jamming" the output of the M-18 Taser officer in the special 18-26 watt range. This is essentially the priority of the neuromuscular junction and commands the muscles to recover. The subjects of these experiments, refers repeatedly to the feeling that instantly andcompletely "closed", the truth of what appears clearly in the video. There is no requirement of time that the Taser to "build" the effect. The devastating effects are immediate and last up to when electricity is applied.

There are advantages and disadvantages to both guns with rubber bullets and tasers, which first price. You can buy a base 80-100000 volt stun gun for about 20-25 dollars with the most powerful models lithium battery running upward75-80 U.S. dollars each. Taser on the other hand, has hundreds of dollars range. You pay for the latest technologies! Two other obvious advantages of Taser's stand-off capability and immediate debilitating effect. The police used the taser to subdue violent individuals immediately, while a cheaper Stun Gun is great for the crap of a wonderful striker and the target area safely.

I hope that explanation makes sense. Iwelcomes comments and suggestions from those with extensive experience in this field.